Ideas on Policing (Click here for main page)

Our views on reasonable grounds for to bring charges under law   first of all allow me to repeat what I have said many times before in my various musings in the Subject of the use of the English language with adroit, competent application to a matter at Hand so as to bring real brilliance to shine in what argument is put forth in the best manner Possible given this greatest tool of language which has no equal in what is the level of variety Of words to ensure precise meaning and expressions as seem to shine a light on the subject Matter with such illumination as to have completely rendered redundant any further attempt To further explain the meaning of the deliverer of the message leaving the matter therefore To proceed in discussion with utmost clarity possibly then already in evidence as to the actual Cause for concern in any idea of what has been set forth in the discourse to now. The video above is from the British genre movie “A man for all seasons” (The conflict arising at law between sir thomas Moore and King Henry VIII)  (a 60 year old movie would you believe) And no doubt part of what genre of knowledge brought to mankind the WOKE movement in its nihilistic Wisdom (using reverse logic in the use of that word as an oxymoron is what you get when you seek to Combine and make normal seeming the pairing of these words which are mutually exclusive in fact – specifically “nihilist wisdom” rather than “nihilist folly” (to say the least) The particular scene from the movie was referred to by a Canadian MP in recent committee testimony To suggest that laws are best made that speak very specifically to specific offences with clear meaning And language that leaves nothing to vagaries in execution of enforcement, rather than relying on generalities Professing principles and values of a good society which he says do not give the best direction when It comes to those who need a greater sense of security in either enforcing or staying on the “right” side of what clear infractions are in the legal code, as he thinks perhaps that he may run afoul More easily perhaps if he were held to the spirit of the law more so than only specific acts that are Spelled out and codified as offences for which one could b charged. The question as to whether we give the devil too, "the benefit of law” by choosing to wait until anyone has committed a clear act of defiance against the betterment of the community with a specific actus reus” compliant (being guilty of committing a culpable act under the law of whatever nature) or acting in preemptive manner so as to prevent him for doing any harm we suspect he is quite quite likely Heading to become involved in. For example, should we stop waiting till Antifa mob members actually involve themselves in acts of riotous endeavour against the better pillars of society they Tend to be set upon or is waiting till you see a window smashed or a car set ablaze before you Have a right of sanction against such anti-social ideas of group affiliation, all things considered. I say the law need to be clear on a VALID, SANE, DECENT, HUMAN MINDED aim in any section of a body of law which spells out the intent of the law so as to allow for action against those Who violate its spirit in what would be an unjust situation to ignore and to thereby allow – further To which all easily identifiable acts of transgression to the best spirit of our community in the Intent spelled out the section of law, must be included in reasonable enough detail so as to Leave no question on the matter, where a better sanity is to prevail with such certainty and thereby make even more clear what the law aims to address in general terms, so as to save The community from harm that is, always keeping those who are innocent of evil mindedness and evil doing, and with best merit as decent human beings therefore best served or the law Might as well be an ass as has often been said when clearly the opposite sorts are served By misapplication in enforcement or a faulty intent in drafting a law in the first place such As to sanction with censorship laws inhibiting a decent mans right to speak out clearly against all evil in the realm as is the right under natural law and which every basic constitutional body of law must respect if it is to be more than A rag without merit or meaning for what else may be considered good enough an idea of law instead. Michael Rizzo Chessman Human Rights Leader & crusader F info@ideasforpolicing.com   (Tel) 416-900-5754 (Leave message) Teach the kids in a Christianly way!